The Swan
Seven forty-five. The car park is half-dark and the air has that flat March cold to it - not winter, not dramatic, just enough to make you pull the jacket tighter as you cross from the car. I push through the swinging doors and my body does something it’s been doing for twenty years. It shifts. Not a decision. Not a conscious thing. Just a change in register - the way your breathing gets shallower, the way your shoulders set, the way something in your chest tightens half a turn. Pavlovian. The building is the bell and your nervous system is already salivating.
The coffee hasn’t happened yet. Nothing has happened yet. The waiting room is empty. The screens are dark. The phones are quiet. But your body doesn’t care about the quiet. Your body has been here before. It knows what this building becomes at nine o’clock. It knows the shape of what’s coming - four hundred, five hundred, six hundred tasks - even if it doesn’t know the number. It’s already gearing up for an event it recognises, the way a boxer’s hands start wrapping themselves before the brain has decided to fight.
I stand in the corridor for a moment. Just a building. Just doors and desks and chairs. In an hour it will be something else entirely, and I will be the person most of it falls to, and nobody outside these walls will know that.
The coffee can wait. The morning can’t.
By the end of the morning the practice will have processed 633 clinical tasks. I don’t know that yet, standing in the corridor. I’ll know it later, the way you always know it later - when the numbers land and you feel the weight of them settle into a shape you recognise. Nearly half will have been mine. That’s not a boast. It’s just what the morning does to this building, and to the person who happens to be standing in it at seven forty-five with their chest already tightening.
Somewhere between the cancer referral and the paronychia and the 170 prescriptions, I’ll have had a cup of tea. Probably.
633
Eight o’clock. The building is quiet. Not empty - there are people in rooms, screens warming up, phones beginning to ring - but quiet in the way GP surgeries are quiet. No trolleys in corridors. No crash bleeps. No overhead announcements. Just doors and desks and a waiting room with chairs that could seat thirty but currently seat none.
By nine, 240 clinical tasks. By ten, 365. By eleven, 496. By midday, 633.
Six hundred and thirty-three clinical interactions. One building. Four hours. Twenty-one members of staff. And at no point was there a queue in the waiting room. If you’d walked past the surgery at half ten and glanced through the window, you’d have seen nothing. An ordinary building on an ordinary Monday. You might have assumed we weren’t very busy.
That assumption is the whole problem.
Most of those 633 never walked through the door. They’d sent a message, or we’d picked up a result, or a prescription had been requested, or a letter had landed from a hospital that needed reading and acting on. The work doesn’t announce itself. It arrives. Silently. Electronically. Relentlessly. Rising under the surface where nobody thinks to look.
Four tasks a minute. Before most people had started their day.
There’s a thing swans do that most people know about but nobody really thinks about. From the bank, from the towpath, from the bench where you’re eating your lunch, the swan is composure itself. Neck curved. Head still. Moving across the water like the water is doing the work. Underneath, the legs are going like hell.
That’s us. That’s Monday.
What the number doesn’t hold
Here’s what 633 doesn’t tell you.
It doesn’t tell you that one of those tasks was an urgent referral for someone who needed to be seen within two weeks, and that the letter had to be precise because language matters when you’re telling a hospital that something might be cancer. It doesn’t tell you that the next task was reassuring someone that the lump they’d found was almost certainly nothing. Two tasks. Adjacent on the screen. Opposite ends of the emotional register. You don’t pause between them. There is no decompression. You just… move.
It doesn’t tell you about the specialist service that asked us to arrange blood tests for a condition they were managing, using a protocol they designed. Their patient. Their treatment. Our problem. You write back, politely, explaining that this isn’t commissioned as part of your contract. That letter takes longer than the blood test would have done. The irony doesn’t even register anymore. It’s just weather.
It doesn’t tell you about the teenager whose mum needed a letter for the college. The daughter has a diagnosis that means the world asks more of her than it gives back, and the college wanted her to catch up on everything she’d missed in the worst six months of her life. You write the letter. You name the diagnoses. You invoke the Equality Act. You hope someone reads it who has the power to care. You also know that nobody else in the building could have written that letter - not because they’re not capable, but because they don’t know this patient, don’t know the history, don’t know which words the college needs to hear. You know this, and you file it in the part of your brain where you keep the things that keep you up at night.
It doesn’t tell you about the person who became suddenly unwell and needed examining, or the child with a new problem whose mum wanted to see the doctor, or the rash that hadn’t responded to the cream you’d suggested last week, or the person who’d seen something in the news about a new medication and wondered if it might help.
And it doesn’t tell you about the eighty-eight results. Each one a decision. Normal, file. Abnormal, act. Borderline, think. Eighty-eight tiny forks in eighty-eight different roads. One needs referring. One needs reassuring. One needs antibiotics. One needs a letter. One needs you to explain a blood result in words that don’t frighten them. One needs you to say “this is not your job to arrange” to a service that assumed it was. One needs you to notice the combination of symptoms that doesn’t quite fit the story the patient is telling themselves - and to hold that noticing gently, because sometimes the thing you’ve recognised is something they’re not ready to hear, and the skill isn’t in the diagnosis but in the timing of when you say it out loud.
You move between them without breaking the surface. That’s the job. That’s the skill nobody sees.
The architecture
I believed in this before it had a name. Before COVID made it compulsory. Before NHS England published their blueprint. The principle was simple and it was right: get people to the right care, first time. Don’t make them sit in a waiting room for two hours to see someone who can’t help them. Don’t make them tell their story three times to three different people. Don’t make the system’s inefficiency into the patient’s problem.
I still believe in it. I spent this morning being the proof that it works. I also spent this morning wondering, not for the first time, what happens to the proof when the person holding it gets tired.
But something happened to the idea on its way to becoming policy. The system absorbed it the way systems always absorb good ideas - it kept the mechanics and lost the philosophy. “Right care first time” became “appropriate signposting.” And the architecture I helped build - the asynchronous workflow, the messaging, the triage model that lets twenty-one people process 633 tasks without a queue forming - became invisible. Not because it failed. Because it worked.
When total triage works, nothing happens that anyone can see.
The whole point. A good thing. It is also what a system looks like when it has made its own labour invisible, and I’m no longer sure those are different things.
But the politician doesn’t see it. The journalist doesn’t see it. The person on Twitter who says “you can’t get a GP appointment these days” doesn’t see it. The people who decide what general practice is worth - in pounds, per patient, per year - don’t see it.
Think of a hospital outpatient department. A big one - multiple specialties running simultaneously, orthopaedics in one room, cardiology in another, dermatology down the corridor. A building designed for the purpose, with separate teams for prescriptions, separate teams for results, separate teams for admin, separate teams for letters. That whole operation - all those people, all that infrastructure - sees somewhere between 100 and 180 patients in a four-hour session.
We did 633. In a converted house on a lane in Surrey. And the same clinicians who were seeing patients were also doing the prescriptions, the results, the documents, and the admin. There is no back office. There is no separate team. The other stuff is your stuff. It’s all your stuff.
The hospital is the theatre. General practice is the roadie. The hospital has corridors and ambulances and the word “emergency” written on the building. General practice has a waiting room and opening hours on a noticeboard.
And everyone thanks the theatre.
The number that frightens me
Here’s what frightens me about that number.
Three hundred and one tasks. Forty-eight per cent. One person. You can build speed like this. You can groove the pattern recognition into your nervous system over twenty years until it looks like instinct. You learn to look at a prescription request and know in three seconds whether it’s straightforward or whether it needs a conversation. You learn to scan a hospital letter and know immediately which bit requires action and which bit is padding. You learn the rhythms of your own patient list - who calls when they’re worried, who calls when they’re lonely, who never calls at all and that’s the one you worry about. Twenty years of this. Muscle memory. Institutional knowledge. The kind of expertise that doesn’t announce itself because it looks like speed.
But speed is fragile. It depends on the person still being there.
What happens when a GP who carries this burden leaves?
Not retires. Not dies at the desk, though the joke has been made and nobody laughed. Just… leaves. Decides the economics don’t work anymore. Decides the ratio of invisible work to visible reward has tipped past the point where it makes sense to keep going. Decides the thing they built - the triage model, the workflow, the relationships with patients who’ve been coming for fifteen years - can be somebody else’s problem now. Decides they’re tired. Not of the patients. Not of the medicine. Of carrying half the weight of a building that nobody outside it will ever see.
Where do the 301 go?
They don’t go to another GP, because there isn’t one. Not one with the same pattern recognition, not one who can process 170 prescriptions and fifty results and write an Equality Act letter and decline an inappropriate blood test request and still have appointments available by ten o’clock. That person was made slowly, over decades, by doing this work in this building for these patients. The knowledge doesn’t transfer. The speed doesn’t transfer. The invisible architecture doesn’t transfer. It walks out the door with the person who holds it and the building gets quieter in a way that has nothing to do with composure.
The 301 don’t disappear. They redistribute. They become the waiting list. They become the phone that rings for forty-five minutes. They become the appointment you can’t get. They become the queue that wasn’t there before - the one that makes the building finally look busy, the one that makes the politicians finally notice.
But they only notice because the system has failed. Not because anyone understood what it looked like when it was working.
The swan stops gliding. And only then does anyone look at the legs.
Other GPs would not find any of this extraordinary. They would read these numbers and recognise them immediately. They wouldn’t say “that’s a lot.” They’d say “that’s Monday.”
Because it is Monday. And Tuesday. And Wednesday. And Thursday. And Friday. And the occasional Saturday when the enhanced access rota comes round and you do it again in a building that’s supposed to be closed.
I drove home. The car park was empty. The lights were off. The building looked like nothing had happened there.
From the outside, nothing had.




Powerful. Love the swan analogy. The hospital system here in NJ and NYC look very different. Positively expressed, you are running on all,pistons. Your part in the process is incredibly important. But what if you leave?
Doctors here are leaving. Retiring. Quitting. Changing careers ( a pediatrician friend left her practice to run and get elected mayor). My parents’ gerontologist left the practice. No forwarding address. The next time I could get my 90 year old parents with dementia to be seen was six months out. Emergency rooms are stacked. Waiting rooms are full. Around the clock.
I have so much respect and gratitude for what you do. Keep writing. Take care of yourself. 🙏💜
Amazing as ever Dave. I so recognise this feeling it send shivers down my spine. I have carried this for so long and sadly now am struggling with it...in fact honestly cannot do it anymore. No one notices what we carry until we cannot carry it anymore. As you say the big shiny building - is just that - big and shiny and glamorous but the real work is done in that relentless day in day out challenge after challenge way. Thank you for putting it into words. I am still in the building butI don't know for how long